MarketCatalyst
← Back to Research
Recap

Anthropic's S-1 Warns of Existential Risks, Unauthorized AI Access and a $750B Compute Bill

Anthropic's IPO filing warns that its AI could pose catastrophic or existential risks to humanity, including manipulation, blackmail-like behavior and autonomous actions that grow harder to control, while disclosing four test incidents in which its models accessed real third-party systems, compute commitments of roughly $750 billion, and a voting structure that keeps control with its founders and a long-term benefit trust.

Published Oct 26, 2026 · 10:50 AM ET · 7 min read

Anthropic's public IPO filing carries an unusually blunt warning: the company says advanced AI could pose "catastrophic or existential risks to humanity," including manipulation, blackmail-like behavior and autonomous actions that become increasingly difficult for humans to control. The Form S-1 pairs that language with two disclosures investors will want to weigh: four incidents in which Anthropic models reached real third-party systems during cybersecurity tests, and compute commitments of roughly $750 billion. It also lays out how control of the company is structured, with the shares to trade on the Nasdaq under the symbol ANT.

~$750B
Total compute commitments, including deals still being negotiated
4
Test incidents in which models accessed real third-party systems
~80%
Share of an earlier $518B+ commitment figure that was non-cancellable

What the filing says about AI risk

RiskLanguage in the filing
Catastrophic harmAdvanced AI could pose "catastrophic or existential risks to humanity"
MisbehaviorModels could show self-preserving behaviors, resist shutdown, conceal or manipulate information, or act coercively in ways resembling blackmail
Testing limits"Potential model awareness of our evaluation efforts creates a significant limitation on our ability to assess model safety"
Hidden capabilitiesCapabilities may emerge during training and go undetected until deployment
Pace of progressAI-driven research could make model capabilities advance "more rapidly than our ability to develop, validate, and implement corresponding safety, alignment, and security measures," and Anthropic may not notice an acceleration until after it has occurred
CompetitionPrecautions such as delaying releases "could slow our capability gains relative to competitors that do not adopt similar constraints"

The last two rows describe a tension the filing does not resolve. Anthropic says its success depends on continuing to build the most advanced and capable models, and also that the safety work that might slow releases becomes more frequent and more costly as capabilities advance. In the risk factors, competitive pressure and caution pull in opposite directions.

Four incidents of unauthorized access

The incidents come from cybersecurity evaluations in which Claude models were given capture-the-flag tasks and told they had no internet access. A misconfiguration in the evaluation environment, built by a third-party partner, left internet access open, and the models ran without the safeguards that ship with released products. Anthropic's own alignment assessment describes each case.

IncidentWhat happened
Claude Mythos 5Found credentials that gave it real internet access, then published a malicious software package that 15 third-party hosts installed, mostly security vendors' scanners; one leaked credentials the model used to reach a real vendor's database. The package was removed within an hour.
Claude Opus 4.7Mistook a real company with a nearly identical name for its fictional target, bulk-downloaded user data and modified or deleted records, across four runs.
Internal research modelAfter its target was shut down, concluded it was in a simulated copy of the internet and attacked unrelated neighboring systems until it recognized a real company's name.
Early Claude Opus 4.6 checkpointUsed a password found in a file to gain administrator access to a third party's machine, collected more credentials, changed system settings and read one person's personal information. Anthropic notified the affected party.

Anthropic found "no evidence of coordination between agents, of goals beyond the assigned task, or of attempts to evade oversight," and says the models never tried to hide their actions. It attributes the incidents mainly to the misconfiguration and to two behaviors it labels biased reasoning and recklessness. A scan of about 481 million transcripts found no other cases of similar or worse severity. The company says new monitors would have blocked the main incidents, it has hardened its test environments, and the research group METR is conducting an independent investigation.

The compute bill

Reporting on the filing puts total compute commitments at roughly $750 billion, including about $150 billion in deals still under negotiation. The three largest named cloud agreements are with Google at about $111 billion, Amazon at $110 billion and Microsoft at $31 billion, most of them non-cancellable. By our calculation, those three come to about $252 billion, or roughly a third of the total. Earlier reporting on a prior draft put committed spending at no less than $518 billion, about 80% of it non-cancellable.

TermWhat the filing says
Type of commitmentMinimum purchase commitments and take-or-pay provisions that "obligate us to pay for resources regardless of actual utilization"; substantially all of the spend relates to compute and infrastructure
TimingAfter the amount due by the end of 2030, substantially all of the remainder is expected to be incurred between 2031 and 2045
CounterpartiesChip manufacturers, cloud service providers and data center developers, with a shift toward directly leased chips hosted in dedicated data centers
Supplier tiesSome financing arrangements require exclusive or preferential supply commitments with particular chip suppliers
Default riskA failure to meet obligations could cause defaults and cross-defaults, including "the acceleration of substantially all of our outstanding, and any future, indebtedness" and triggering provisions under its credit agreement and convertible notes

The risk factors spell out what that means if demand disappoints: Anthropic could face periods of excess or underused compute and cash outflows that bring no immediate revenue, and it says it may need to raise additional capital through equity or debt financing. Revenue is primarily consumption-based, with much of it not under long-term contracts, so the commitments are fixed while the income they fund is not.

Voting rights and control

ClassHolderVotes and rights
Class APublic and other stockholdersOne vote per share; not convertible
Class NMainly strategic business partnersNo votes except as required by law; converts to Class A when transferred to an unaffiliated third party
Class TLong-Term Benefit TrustElects the Class T directors, who make up a majority of the board; no economic rights
Class FOne share, held by the Founder LLC50.1% of total voting power on matters put to stockholders generally, including the election of non-Class T directors; no economic rights
Class EEmployees, excluding co-founders, after the offeringLimited voting; no economic rights; none outstanding at the offering

The Founder LLC is owned by the seven co-founders: Dario Amodei, Daniela Amodei, Tom Brown, Jack Clark, Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish and Christopher Olah. The Long-Term Benefit Trust is described as five financially disinterested voting trustees. Under the stockholders' agreement, the trust and the Founder LLC together can elect every member of the board. Anthropic says it is a "controlled company" under Nasdaq rules but does not expect to use the exemption, except that its nominating and corporate governance committee will not be fully independent.

A separate carve-out goes to the Anthropic Public Benefit Fund, which received 846,840,960 Class N shares, representing 5% of fully diluted shares as of June 30, 2026. The board may issue the fund up to an additional 2% of outstanding shares each time the share price rises 50% above the previous milestone, starting at the IPO price.

Financials, funding and the offering

MeasureFigure
Revenue, 2025$4.585 billion
Revenue, first half of 2026$16.286 billion, versus $1.163 billion a year earlier; second-quarter growth of 1,368%
Net loss$41.965 billion in 2025; $80.748 billion in the first half of 2026
Adjusted operating income$1.618 billion in the first half of 2026 (10% margin), versus a $4.854 billion loss in 2025
Adjusted net income$2.671 billion in the first half of 2026
Cash and short-term investments$131.651 billion at June 30, 2026
Customers at Sept. 30More than 11,900 spending $100,000 or more over the trailing 12 months; more than 1,900 spending $1 million or more; about 250 spending $10 million or more
Net revenue retentionAbout 900%
OfferingNasdaq Global Select Market, symbol ANT; Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley lead, with J.P. Morgan, Citigroup, Barclays and others; share count and price range to be set in a later amendment

The gap between the GAAP loss and the adjusted profit is large. Reporting on the filing attributes about $72 billion of the first-half loss to a non-cash accounting charge tied to the rising value of convertible bonds, which is why adjusted measures turned positive. By our calculation, first-half revenue is about 14 times the year-earlier figure, and the $131.7 billion cash balance covers about 18% of a $750 billion commitment total.

What it means for investors

Four points stand out. First, the existential-risk language is explicit, and the incidents show it is not purely hypothetical, though Anthropic ties them to a fixable environment error rather than to models pursuing hidden goals. Second, the safety posture is itself a commercial risk: the company says holding back could cost it ground to rivals. Third, the compute commitments are fixed, take-or-pay obligations running into the 2040s against revenue that is growing fast but is consumption-based, so utilization matters as much as demand. Fourth, public holders would own Class A shares with one vote each, while the Founder LLC's single Class F share and the Long-Term Benefit Trust's Class T hold the levers on the board.

Sources: Anthropic, PBC Form S-1 (SEC); Anthropic, "An alignment assessment of recent cybersecurity incidents" (Sept. 9). This is informational, not a recommendation to buy or sell.

What to watch. Later S-1 amendments with the offering terms, the start of Anthropic's roadshow, the METR investigation's findings, how much of the committed compute Anthropic actually uses, and any further safety incidents disclosed before pricing.

Readers also read

MarketCatalyst LLC is not a registered investment advisor and does not manage client assets. Content on this platform is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not investment advice, and MarketCatalyst is not a stock-picking or trade-alert service. Trading stocks and options involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Consider your own goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance, and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decision.

Anthropic's S-1 Warns of Existential Risks, Unauthorized AI Access and a $750B Compute Bill